Network failure may prevent promotion
От
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Тема
Network failure may prevent promotion
Дата
Msg-id
20231231.200741.1078989336605759878.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Ответ на
libpqsrv_connect_params should call ProcessWalRcvInterrupts (Kyotaro Horiguchi)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
libpqsrv_connect_params should call ProcessWalRcvInterrupts Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Network failure may prevent promotion Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Yura Sokolov <y.sokolov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Re: Network failure may prevent promotion Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
(Apology for resubmitting due to poor subject of the previous mail) --- Hello. We've noticed that when walreceiver is waiting for a connection to complete, standby does not immediately respond to promotion requests. In PG14, upon receiving a promotion request, walreceiver terminates instantly, but in PG16, it waits for connection timeout. This behavior is attributed to commit 728f86fec65, where a part of libpqrcv_connect was simply replaced with a call to libpqsrc_connect_params. This behavior can be verified by simply dropping packets from the standby to the primary. By a simple thought, in walreceiver, libpqsrv_connect_internal could just call ProcessWalRcvInterrupts() instead of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS(), but this approach is quite ugly. Since ProcessWalRcvInterrupts() originally calls CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() and there are no standalone calls to CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() within walreceiver, I think it might be better to use ProcDiePending instead of ShutdownRequestPending. I added a subset function of die() as the SIGTERM handler in walsender in a crude patch attached. What do you think about the issue, and the approach? If there are no issues or objections with this method, I will continue to refine this patch. For now, I plan to register it for the upcoming commitfest. regards. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата: