On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:31:26PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've pushed 0001 and 0002, which seem pretty uncontroversial.
Thanks!
> Attached is a rebased 0003, just to keep the cfbot happy.
> I'm kind of wondering whether 0003 is worth the complexity TBH,
> but in any case I ran out of time to look at it closely today.
Yeah. It's not as bad as I was expecting, but it does add a bit more
complexity than is probably warranted. I'm not wedded to this approach.
BTW I intend to start a new thread for the bugs I mentioned upthread that
were revealed by setting wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 1ms in the tests.
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com