Re: use has_privs_of_role() for pg_hba.conf

On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 09:57:02AM -0700, David G. Johnston wrote:
> I would tend to agree that even membership probably shouldn't be involved
> here, and that this entire feature would be implemented in an orthogonal
> manner.  I don't see any specific need to try and move to a more isolated
> implementation, but trying to involve inheritance just seems wrong.  The
> status quo seems like a good place to stay.

Okay, I think there are sufficient votes against this change to simply mark
it Rejected.  Thanks for the discussion!

-- 
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com