On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 10:29:38AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> > So based on that I think that we could just apply and backpatch what
> > you have here. This issue is much easier to reason about on HEAD
> > where we just care about Win >= 10, and we've be rather careful with
> > changes like that when it came to Windows. Any objections about doing
> > a backpatch? I'd like to do so after an extra lookup, if there are no
> > objections. Or would folks prefer a HEAD-only fix for now?
>
> Let's just fix it in HEAD. I think the risk/reward ratio isn't very
> good here.
>
> (I'd be particularly against changing this in v10, because 10.23 will
> be the last one; there will be no second chance if we ship it broken.)
+1