Re: Efficient output for integer types
От
Tomas Vondra
Тема
Re: Efficient output for integer types
Дата
Msg-id
20200111133159.ppxnocexkdduo4m6@development
Ответ на
Re: Efficient output for integer types (David Fetter)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Tels <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: Efficient output for integer types Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Re: Efficient output for integer types David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Hi, Any plans regarding committing this patch? I see the thread is silent since September 24, when the last patch version was posted. The patch is already marked as RFC since December, when David changed the status. I don't have any opinion whether the patch is RFC or not (it might well be), but IMHO it should have been mentioned in this thread. I did a quick test to see how much more efficient this is, and for a table with 10 bigint columns and 5M random rows the COPY to /dev/null went from 3000 ms to ~2700 ms. That's not the 30% speedup mentioned by David in the first message, but 10% is still pretty nice. Of course, for real-world use cases the speedup will be lower because of using other data types too, I/O etc. But it's still nice. So, is anyone opposed to pushing this? If not, who'll to do that? I see Andrew Gierth was involved in the discussions on IRC and it's related to the Ryu patch, so maybe he want's to take care of this. Andrew? regards -- Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления