Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andres Freund
Тема Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files
Дата
Msg-id 20190128211231.7xtkq4lzlt44mmr2@alap3.anarazel.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 2019-01-28 13:02:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> It's not required by C99, it however is required by C11. But a lot of
> compilers have allowed it as an extension for a long time (like before
> C99), unless suppressed by some option. I think that's partially because
> C++ has allowed it for longer.  I don't know how many of the BF
> compilers could be made to accept that - I'd be very suprised if yours couldn't.

Hm, it's only in gcc 4.6, so that's probably too recent.

Greetings,

Andres Freund


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Built-in connection pooler
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSTALL file