Re: Proposed refactoring of planner header files

Hi,

On 2019-01-28 13:02:11 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> It's not required by C99, it however is required by C11. But a lot of
> compilers have allowed it as an extension for a long time (like before
> C99), unless suppressed by some option. I think that's partially because
> C++ has allowed it for longer.  I don't know how many of the BF
> compilers could be made to accept that - I'd be very suprised if yours couldn't.

Hm, it's only in gcc 4.6, so that's probably too recent.

Greetings,

Andres Freund