Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Christoph Berg
Тема
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements
Дата
Msg-id
20181129094500.GD9562@msg.df7cb.de
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Sergei Agalakov <sergei.agalakov@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names in pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements legrand legrand <legrand_legrand@hotmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names in pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Sergei Agalakov <sergei.agalakov@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names in pg_stat_statements Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Sergei Agalakov <sergei.agalakov@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Sergei Agalakov <sergei.agalakov@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Sergei Agalakov <sergei.agalakov@gmail.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [PROPOSAL] extend the object names to the qualified names inpg_stat_statements Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>
Re: Tomas Vondra 2018-11-28 <1b4e4c5e-7007-cd61-aae5-4a1c248e385c@2ndquadrant.com>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient / better to just store the search_path used
> when executing the query? That should be enough to resolve the object
> names correctly, and the overhead would be much lower (both in terms
> extra space and CPU overhead).

That would also work better for sub-queries from functions, if you
wanted to re-run the query in question. It's closer to reality.

Christoph

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: John Naylor
Дата:
От: David Rowley
Дата:
FAQ