Re: Change the name

Chris Travers wrote:
> IMO, certain decisions, such as name changes, should not be made 
> democratically.  They should be made by the body which is responsible 
> for governing the project (though democratic feedback can and should be 
> a part of the process).  *If* the core team wanted to endorse such a 
> name change, then there would be a call for volunteers.
> 
> So here is my only concern:  If the project changes names, it is going 
> to require a lot of grunt work.  We do not want this work to cause 
> delays in future versions of the software.  In my estimation, this may 
> draw out the transition time by months or even years.  However, this is 
> not a bad thing because it means that there is greater community 
> awareness that the change is happening and more time to transition the 
> advocacy efforts.

There seems to be a lot of valid concern about having manpower for this.
I am willing to take the lead and form a team to accomplish this goal if
we decide we want it.  I did the Win32 port so this should be doable.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian            http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +