Re: Regarding Distributed Database features
От
Andrew Sullivan
Тема
Re: Regarding Distributed Database features
Дата
Msg-id
20070713184359.GR8844@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Ответ на
Regarding Distributed Database features (Chidambaram Janamaddi)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Regarding Distributed Database features "Chidambaram Janamaddi" <mail.chidambaram@gmail.com>
Re: Regarding Distributed Database features Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>
Re: Regarding Distributed Database features "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Re: Regarding Distributed Database features Darcy Buskermolen <darcyb@commandprompt.com>
Re: Regarding Distributed Database features Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 02:20:44AM -0400, Chidambaram Janamaddi wrote: > Can you please let me know whether postgreSQL has > Distributed Database supporting features? This depends on what you mean. You can do some of these things via various tools like dbi-link. That said, > Which of the Distributed database functionalities are totally or partially > supported among the following ...................... This sounds like a checklist you got from a marketing website. What is the problem you are trying to solve? > - Local autonomy > - No reliance on a central site These sounds like you want multimaster replication. Postgres doesn't do that today (and I know of only one system that really does, which I couldn't recommend for other reasons). > - Continuous operation Depending on what this means, "Yes". > - Location independence What does this mean? > - Fragmentation independence > - Replication independence And these don't make any sense to me at all. > - Distributed query independence > - Distributed transaction processing Probably not, but depening on what these mean, maybe "sometimes". > - Hardware independence > - Operating system independence > - Network independence I think so. > - Database independence This one is mystifying to me. Regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления