Re: Lost databases
| От | Martijn van Oosterhout |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Lost databases |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20041117112944.GA25482@svana.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Lost databases (Kostis Mentzelos <mentzelos@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Look at the documentation here: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/interactive/maintenance.html The upshot is that you should vacuum every table in the database at least once every billion transaction. It doesn't have to be a VACUUM FULL, just run VACUUM without specifying a table. There's some info in there about how to work out when it is necessary. Hope this helps, On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 12:22:46PM +0200, Kostis Mentzelos wrote: > Only VACUUM FULL solves XID wraparound problem? I mean VACUUM FULL locks > the entire table. > > How can I test if I am close to XID wraparround? > > Kostis > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: