Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
От
Stephan Szabo
Тема
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them?
Дата
Msg-id
20030422072516.U67223-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Ответ на
bit strings - anyone working on them? (Philip Warner)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: bit strings - anyone working on them? Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Philip Warner wrote: > Having just used bit strings for the first time, I am now aware of some > features I consider a little odd, and was wondering if (a) they are > actively being worked on, (b) if they are not considered the way to go, and > (c) if there would be any interest in the additions/changes indicated below. > > 1. Length enforcement: > ---------------------- > > select B'10' | B'1'; > > is currently illegal. > > ISTM we should return B'11' for this. ie. build the smallest varbit that > contains the result, and return it. ISTM that the answer would be closer to B'10' according to the spec. The spec asks for right extension by 0 when casting to a larger size fixed bit string. > 3. extract_bits > --------------- > > extract_bits(varbit bits, int from, int to) returns varbit > > would seem useful. I think substring is the way to do this.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления