Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:

	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches

I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dave Page wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] 
> > Sent: 14 June 2002 06:25
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] FW: Patch for current_schemas to 
> > optionally include implicit 
> > 
> > 
> > Bruce Momjian  writes:
> > > Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied 
> > patches list at:
> > > 	http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches
> > > I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
> > 
> > I believe I objected to that one... we need something like it 
> > but Dave's first cut wasn't right.
> 
> Second cut attached. This one just adds a boolean option to the existing
> function to indicate that implicit schemas are to be included (or not).
> I remembered the docs as well this time :-)
> 
> BTW: Tom, I noticed that temp schemas get added to the path before
> pg_catalog - I would have expected pg_catalog to always be first or have
> I missed something obvious?
> 
> Regards, Dave.

Content-Description: current_schemas.patch

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026