Re: Interpretting WAL debug.

Murthy Kambhampaty  writes:
> At bottom, I suspect you can get your machine tuned without WAL debug, and
> Bruce's paper on tuning, which it looks like you've been reading. I don't
> think, you need to turn on WAL debug for the particular question you asked.

I agree.  The WAL debug code is really intended for *debugging* WAL, not
for tuning purposes.  I think all you really need care about is whether
you get "new log file created" messages and what the frequency of
checkpoints is.

			regards, tom lane