Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval
Дата
Msg-id
15314.1572631210@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval (Peter Geoghegan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and--disable-float8-byval Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Remove configure --disable-float4-byval and --disable-float8-byval Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Peter Geoghegan writes: > On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 7:41 AM Robert Haas wrote: >> Could we get around this by making Datum 8 bytes everywhere? > I really like that idea. > Even Raspberry Pi devices (which can cost as little as $35) use 64-bit > ARM processors. It's abundantly clear that 32-bit platforms do not > matter enough to justify keeping all the SIZEOF_DATUM crud around. This line of argument seems to me to be the moral equivalent of "let's drop 32-bit support altogether". I'm not entirely on board with that. Certainly, a lot of the world is 64-bit these days, but people are still building small systems and they might want a database; preferably one that hasn't been detuned to the extent that it barely manages to run at all on such a platform. Making a whole lot of internal APIs 64-bit would be a pretty big hit for a 32-bit platform --- more instructions, more memory consumed for things like Datum arrays, all in a memory space that's not that big. It seems especially insane to conclude that we should pull the plug on such use-cases just to get rid of one obscure configure option. If we were expending any significant devel effort on supporting 32-bit platforms, I might be ready to drop support, but we're not. (Robert's proposal looks to me like it's actually creating new work to do, not saving work.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата: