Re: Fixed width rows faster?
От
Rod Taylor
Тема
Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Дата
Msg-id
1078530843.57624.24.camel@jester
Ответ на
Re: Fixed width rows faster? (Mike Nolan)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Fixed width rows faster? Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Mike Nolan <nolan@gw.tssi.com>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Dennis Bjorklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Re: Fixed width rows faster? Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 18:43, Mike Nolan wrote: > > Frankly, the only reason to use anything other than TEXT is compatibility with > > other databases and applications. > > You don't consider a requirement that a field be no longer than a > certain length a reason not to use TEXT? Actually, I don't. Good reason to have a check constraint on it though (hint, check constraints can be changed while column types cannot be, at this moment).
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
