Re: failed to re-find parent key
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: failed to re-find parent key |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1074050080.1150.99.camel@localhost.localdomain обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: failed to re-find parent key (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: failed to re-find parent key
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 21:16, Tom Lane wrote: > Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> writes: > > I can't recreate it either, it is only happening on my customers > > machines, which are using an older version of redhat (7.2) and gcc 2.96 > > > Is it possible these versions are relevant to the issue? > > Hmm. Compiler bug maybe? I can't recall if gcc 2.96 had a good > reputation or not. You might try backing off the optimization level > and see if the behavior changes. Also see if there are any errata > available for that compiler package. Thanks for the advice, I'm going to do more tests to try to isolate it > > Also, is this just one machine or several? If only one, I'd try > reindexing that index and see if that helps. Actually the hack checks for oids, and doesn't make the index, if there isn't an oid in the table, so I tried it with a table without oids, and it still occurs. Thanks for the replies; I'll post if I find something relevant. > > regards, tom lane > -- Dave Cramer 519 939 0336 ICQ # 1467551
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: