Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine
| От | Ron Johnson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 1068600291.30969.53.camel@haggis.homelan обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine (Chris Field <cfield@affinitysolutions.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:32, Chris Field wrote: > We are getting ready to spec out a new machine and are wondering about > the wisdom of buying a quad versus a dual processor machine. Seing as > how postgres in not a threaded application, and this server will only be > used for log/transaction analysis (it will only ever have a few large > queries running). Is there any performance to be gained, and if so is > it worth the large cost? Any thoughts/experience are much > appreciated... Xeon or Opteron? The faster Opterons *really* blaze, especially in 64-bit mode. As others have said, though, RAM and I/O are most important. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net Jefferson, LA USA "As I like to joke, I may have invented it, but Microsoft made it popular" David Bradley, regarding Ctrl-Alt-Del
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: