Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine
От
Ron Johnson
Тема
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine
Дата
Msg-id
1068600291.30969.53.camel@haggis.homelan
Ответ на
Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine (Chris Field)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine Chris Field <cfield@affinitysolutions.com>
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine allanwind@lifeintegrity.com (Allan Wind)
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine fred@redhotpenguin.com
Re: Value of Quad vs. Dual Processor machine Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 17:32, Chris Field wrote: > We are getting ready to spec out a new machine and are wondering about > the wisdom of buying a quad versus a dual processor machine. Seing as > how postgres in not a threaded application, and this server will only be > used for log/transaction analysis (it will only ever have a few large > queries running). Is there any performance to be gained, and if so is > it worth the large cost? Any thoughts/experience are much > appreciated... Xeon or Opteron? The faster Opterons *really* blaze, especially in 64-bit mode. As others have said, though, RAM and I/O are most important. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. ron.l.johnson@cox.net Jefferson, LA USA "As I like to joke, I may have invented it, but Microsoft made it popular" David Bradley, regarding Ctrl-Alt-Del
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления