On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 18:18, greg@turnstep.com wrote:
> The GUC route sounds good. I'd like to see ctid handling beefed up at the
> same time. For example, some operators such as != would be nice and might
> ease the pain a little for people used to using oids as their "tuple id" :)
Are we encouraging the use of ctids by applications?
-Neil