Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Ron Johnson
Тема
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID)
Дата
в 15:33:56
Msg-id
1052249594.3371.405.camel@haggis
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) "Chad Thompson" <chad@weblinkservices.com>
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: Looking for a cheap upgrade (RAID) "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
On Tue, 2003-05-06 at 13:12, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On 6 May 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 17:22, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > > On 5 May 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 11:31, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > > > > On 3 May 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Fri, 2003-05-02 at 13:53, Chad Thompson wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > What controller do you use for IDE hot-swapping and auto-rebuild?
> > > > 3Ware?
> > > 
> > > Linux, and I don't do hot swapping with IDE, just hot rebuild from a 
> > > spare drive.  My servers are running SCSI, by the way, only the 
> > > workstations are running IDE.  With the saved cost of a decent RAID 
> > > controller (good SCSI controllers are still well over $500 most the time) 
> > > I can afford enough hot spares to never have to worry about changing one 
> > > out during the day.
> > 
> > Ah, I guess that drives go out infrequently enough that shutting 
> > it down at night for a swap-out isn't all that onerous...
> > 
> > What controller model do you use?
> 
> My preference is SymBIOS (LSI now) plain UW SCSI 160, but at work we use 
> adaptec built in UW SCSI 160 on INTEL dual CPU motherboards.  I've used 
> RAID controllers in the past, but now I genuinely prefer linux's built in 
> kernel level raid to most controllers, and the load on the server is <2% 
> of one of the two CPUs, so it doesn't really slow anything else down.  The 
> performance is quite good, I can read raw at about 48 Megs a second from a 
> pair of 10kRPM UWSCSI drives in a RAID1.  These drives, individually can 
> pump out about 25 megs a second individually.

Hmm, I'm confused (again)...

I thought you liked IDE RAID, because of the price savings.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA      http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|                                                               |
| The purpose of the military isn't to pay your college tuition |
| or give you a little extra income; it's to "kill people and   |
| break things".  Surprisingly, not everyone understands that.  |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Dennis Björklund
Дата:
От: scott.marlowe
Дата:
FAQ