Обсуждение: Bug in pg_get_aios()
Hi,
If I understand correctly, we want to set nulls[0] to true if owner_pid equals to 0:
```
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c b/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
index 8997c762062..bcdd82318f7 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ retry:
if (owner_pid != 0)
values[0] = Int32GetDatum(owner_pid);
else
- nulls[0] = false;
+ nulls[0] = true;
/* column: IO's id */
values[1] = Int32GetDatum(ioh_id);
```
--
Regards,
ChangAo Chen
> On Mar 23, 2026, at 14:23, cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I understand correctly, we want to set nulls[0] to true if owner_pid equals to 0:
>
> ```
> diff --git a/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c b/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
> index 8997c762062..bcdd82318f7 100644
> --- a/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
> +++ b/src/backend/storage/aio/aio_funcs.c
> @@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ retry:
> if (owner_pid != 0)
> values[0] = Int32GetDatum(owner_pid);
> else
> - nulls[0] = false;
> + nulls[0] = true;
>
> /* column: IO's id */
> values[1] = Int32GetDatum(ioh_id);
> ```
>
> --
> Regards,
> ChangAo Chen
Indeed an obvious bug.
If we looking downwards, there is a correct usage:
```
/* column: raw result (i.e. some form of syscall return value) */
if (start_state == PGAIO_HS_COMPLETED_IO
|| start_state == PGAIO_HS_COMPLETED_SHARED
|| start_state == PGAIO_HS_COMPLETED_LOCAL)
values[9] = Int32GetDatum(ioh_copy.result);
else
nulls[9] = true;
```
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 02:30:28PM +0800, Chao Li wrote: >> On Mar 23, 2026, at 14:23, cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote: >> If I understand correctly, we want to set nulls[0] to true if owner_pid equals to 0: > > Indeed an obvious bug. Or the intention of the code could have been to allow a PID value of 0 to be exposed, but I don't really buy it. Will fix, thanks for the report. -- Michael
Вложения
Hi, On March 23, 2026 4:44:21 AM EDT, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: >On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 02:30:28PM +0800, Chao Li wrote: >>> On Mar 23, 2026, at 14:23, cca5507 <cca5507@qq.com> wrote: >>> If I understand correctly, we want to set nulls[0] to true if owner_pid equals to 0: >> >> Indeed an obvious bug. > >Or the intention of the code could have been to allow a PID value of 0 >to be exposed, but I don't really buy it. That certainly wasn't the intent :). I suspect this is unreachable, we wait for ios before exiting, but of course that doesn't excuse broken code. >Will fix, thanks for the report. Thanks! Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.