Обсуждение: fix a spelling mistake

Hi Hackers,

Regards,

Yang Yuanzhuo

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:58:06AM +0800, yangyz wrote:
> When I was reading the comment of the function
> bt_report_duplicate(), I discovered a spelling mistake. Therefore, I
> sent a patch to fix this issue.

Thanks for the report.  I have grabbed this fix and will apply all
these things once the stack gets bigger.
--
Michael

> On Jan 16, 2026, at 11:19, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 08:58:06AM +0800, yangyz wrote:
>> When I was reading the comment of the function
>> bt_report_duplicate(), I discovered a spelling mistake. Therefore, I
>> sent a patch to fix this issue.
>
> Thanks for the report.  I have grabbed this fix and will apply all
> these things once the stack gets bigger.
> --
> Michael

Hi Michael,

I can add a couple to your stack:

1 - This one I ever reported, but was missed in 94a24b4ee5a
```
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/extension.c b/src/backend/commands/extension.c
index 596105ee078..a9529692ae3 100644
--- a/src/backend/commands/extension.c
+++ b/src/backend/commands/extension.c
@@ -2398,7 +2398,7 @@ pg_available_extension_versions(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)

                               /*
                                * Ignore already-found names.  They are not reachable by the
-                                * path search, so don't shown them.
+                                * path search, so don't show them.
                                */
                               extname_str = makeString(extname);
                               if (list_member(found_ext, extname_str))
```

2 - I happened to notice this one yesterday while reviewing your patch, but I hesitated to file a trivial patch, so I
didn’t.
```
diff --git a/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats_funcs.c b/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats_funcs.c
index b4b1bf26463..c0af146451e 100644
--- a/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats_funcs.c
+++ b/src/backend/statistics/extended_stats_funcs.c
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ delete_pg_statistic_ext_data(Oid stxoid, bool inherited)
        HeapTuple       oldtup;
        bool            result = false;

-       /* Is there already a pg_statistic tuple for this attribute? */
+       /* Is there already a pg_statistic_ext_data tuple for this attribute? */
        oldtup = SearchSysCache2(STATEXTDATASTXOID,
                                                         ObjectIdGetDatum(stxoid),
                                                         BoolGetDatum(inherited));
```

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 02:54:40PM +0800, Chao Li wrote:
> -       /* Is there already a pg_statistic tuple for this attribute? */
> +       /* Is there already a pg_statistic_ext_data tuple for this attribute? */
>         oldtup = SearchSysCache2(STATEXTDATASTXOID,
>                                                          ObjectIdGetDatum(stxoid),
>                                                          BoolGetDatum(inherited));

Indeed, this one is on me.  Thanks for the summary.  :)
--
Michael