Обсуждение: Inconsistent terminology for -j/--jobs option in documentation

On Sat, Jan 10, 2026 at 11:48:21AM +0900, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> To double-check, I also looked at the documentation for vacuumdb,
> reindexdb, and pg_upgrade, and all of them use "njobs".

As far as I can see:
$ cd doc && git grep "number-of-jobs" | wc -l
3
$ cd doc && git grep "njobs" | wc -l
14

While it is minor, I agree that we could just make things consistent
across the board as you are suggesting, so LGTM.
--
Michael

On Sun, Jan 11, 2026 at 01:01:33PM +0900, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:
> Yeah, it's minor but there is a quote that says God is in the details.

At some degree, yes, see 540c39cc56f5.
--
Michael