Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment
Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Jelte Fennema-Nio writes: > On Sun, 2 Feb 2025 at 22:26, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmm, our convention is definitely that the numbers start with 1, >> so I do not want to make this change. Maybe we should change >> the code instead. > That would require any extensions that use the _0.out suffix to update > all those files to use _1.out as the suffix. One such extension is > Citus[1]. Oh. I see we did document it as 0-9 in [1], so I guess we're stuck with that now. Objection withdrawn. regards, tom lane [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/regress-variant.html
Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Michael Paquier writes: > Right, let's adjust the comment to reflect what the docs say, as your > patch does. I presume that Tom will do that.. If I complain about it I gotta fix it, huh? Okay, done. regards, tom lane