Обсуждение: check_GUC_init(wal_writer_flush_after) fails with non-default block size

Hi,

If you build with --with-wal-blocksize=/-Dwal_blocksize= anything but
8, this breaks:

running bootstrap script ... LOG:  GUC (PGC_INT)
wal_writer_flush_after, boot_val=256, C-var=128
TRAP: failed Assert("check_GUC_init(hentry->gucvar)"), File: "guc.c",
Line: 1519, PID: 84605

Hi,

On 2023-04-08 13:18:55 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> If you build with --with-wal-blocksize=/-Dwal_blocksize= anything but
> 8, this breaks:
> 
> running bootstrap script ... LOG:  GUC (PGC_INT)
> wal_writer_flush_after, boot_val=256, C-var=128
> TRAP: failed Assert("check_GUC_init(hentry->gucvar)"), File: "guc.c",
> Line: 1519, PID: 84605

> From 48d971e0b19f770991e334b8dc38422462b4485e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2023 13:12:48 +1200
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix default wal_writer_flush_after value.

LGTM.

Greetings,

Andres

On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:21 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2023-04-08 13:18:55 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] Fix default wal_writer_flush_after value.
> LGTM.

Thanks, pushed.

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 11:26:31AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 5:21 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > On 2023-04-08 13:18:55 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > Subject: [PATCH] Fix default wal_writer_flush_after value.
> > LGTM.
>
> Thanks, pushed.

Somewhat forgot about this thread.  Thanks for the fix!
--
Michael