Обсуждение: Missing rules for queryjumblefuncs.{funcs,switch}.c for maintainer-clean

Hi all,

Nathan has reported to me offlist that maintainer-clean was not doing
its job for the files generated by gen_node_support.pl in
src/backend/nodes/ for the query jumbling.  Attached is a patch to
take care of this issue.

While on it, I have found a comment in the related README that was
missing a refresh.

Any objections or comments?
--
Michael

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:18:17PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> A minor comment for the README is that now we have five support
> functions not four.
>
> - outcome.  (For some classes of node types, you don't need all four support
> + outcome.  (For some classes of node types, you don't need all five support

Right, missed that.  How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
and make that simpler?  I would propose:
"For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
functions."
--
Michael

> On 20 Mar 2023, at 08:46, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:

> How about removing the "fout/five" entirely here
> and make that simpler?  I would propose:
> "For some classes of node types, you don't need all the support
> functions."

Yes please, keeping such counts in sync is always error-prone.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> Nathan has reported to me offlist that maintainer-clean was not doing
> its job for the files generated by gen_node_support.pl in
> src/backend/nodes/ for the query jumbling.  Attached is a patch to
> take care of this issue.
> While on it, I have found a comment in the related README that was
> missing a refresh.
> Any objections or comments?

Is similar knowledge missing in the meson build files?

            regards, tom lane

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:21:28AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is similar knowledge missing in the meson build files?

src/backend/nodes/meson.build and src/include/nodes/meson.build are
the two meson files that have the knowledge about the files generated
by gen_node_support.pl, and the query jumbling files are consistent
with that since 0e681cf.  Perhaps I've missed an extra spot?
--
Michael

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 04:04:31PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> Agreed. +1 to remove the counts.

Thanks.  Adjusted this way, then.
--
Michael