Re: printing oid with %d
Re: printing oid with %d
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Michael Paquier writes: > Good catch. Yep, Oids are unsigned. We don't backpatch such things > usually, do we? Particularly, this one should not be triggerable > normally because no code paths should call JsonEncodeDateTime() with > an unsupported type Oid. Yeah, given that it should be an unreachable case, there's likely no need to back-patch. regards, tom lane
printing oid with %d
От:
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Дата:
+JsonEncodeDateTime(char *buf, Datum value, Oid typid)
...
+ elog(ERROR, "unknown jsonb value datetime type oid %d", typid);
I think this should be %u.
commit cc4feded0a31d2b732d4ea68613115cb720e624e
Author: Andrew Dunstan
Date: Tue Jan 16 19:07:13 2018 -0500
Centralize json and jsonb handling of datetime types
Re: printing oid with %d
От:
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Дата:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 08:55:23PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > +JsonEncodeDateTime(char *buf, Datum value, Oid typid) > ... > + elog(ERROR, "unknown jsonb value datetime type oid %d", typid); > > I think this should be %u. Good catch. Yep, Oids are unsigned. We don't backpatch such things usually, do we? Particularly, this one should not be triggerable normally because no code paths should call JsonEncodeDateTime() with an unsupported type Oid. -- Michael
Re: printing oid with %d
От:
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Дата:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 10:35:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Yeah, given that it should be an unreachable case, there's likely > no need to back-patch. Thanks. Fixed on HEAD then. -- Michael