Обсуждение: pgsql: Fix wrong file path in header comment
Fix wrong file path in header comment Header comment of shm_mq.c was mistakenly specifying path to shm_mq.h. It was introduced in ec9037df. So, theoretically it could be backpatched to 9.4, but it doesn't seem to worth it. Branch ------ master Details ------- https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a01d0fa1d889cc2003e1941e8b98707c4d701ba9 Modified Files -------------- src/backend/storage/ipc/shm_mq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:26 PM Alexander Korotkov <akorotkov@postgresql.org> wrote: > Header comment of shm_mq.c was mistakenly specifying path to shm_mq.h. > It was introduced in ec9037df. So, theoretically it could be > backpatched to 9.4, but it doesn't seem to worth it. I didn't backpatch, because I thought it doesn't worth it to create buzz over single wrong path in the comment. But, I found 12 similar cases in our source tree. Do you think it worth backpatching now? ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
Вложения
Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > I didn't backpatch, because I thought it doesn't worth it to create > buzz over single wrong path in the comment. But, I found 12 similar > cases in our source tree. Do you think it worth backpatching now? Nah, just fix 'em in HEAD. regards, tom lane
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 5:36 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> writes: > > I didn't backpatch, because I thought it doesn't worth it to create > > buzz over single wrong path in the comment. But, I found 12 similar > > cases in our source tree. Do you think it worth backpatching now? > > Nah, just fix 'em in HEAD. OK, thanks. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company