Обсуждение: [pgsql-www] PG 10 documentation URL
Shouldn't this https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html rather be https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html ? -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Shouldn't this
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html
rather be
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html
?
Certainly seems that way to me, given the version number we decided on :)
Dave, was there a particular reasoning behind adding the .0 to the url (since you had to hack the regexps anyway)?
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> >> Shouldn't this >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html >> >> rather be >> >> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html >> >> ? > > > > Certainly seems that way to me, given the version number we decided on :) > > Dave, was there a particular reasoning behind adding the .0 to the url > (since you had to hack the regexps anyway)? I didn't add the .0 - I hacked the regexps to handle 2 digits before the . There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app issue). -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut
> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> Shouldn't this
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10.0/static/index.html
>>
>> rather be
>>
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/index.html
>>
>> ?
>
>
>
> Certainly seems that way to me, given the version number we decided on :)
>
> Dave, was there a particular reasoning behind adding the .0 to the url
> (since you had to hack the regexps anyway)?
I didn't add the .0 - I hacked the regexps to handle 2 digits before the .
Ah, OK.
There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the
new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will
automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the
generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app
issue).
Not particularly much more it seems. I'll commit a patch for this shortly.
You never actually built any PDFs, right?
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > >> There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the >> new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will >> automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the >> generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app >> issue). > > > Not particularly much more it seems. I'll commit a patch for this shortly. Oh, sweet - that's one less thing on my todo :-) > You never actually built any PDFs, right? No, we don't normally for betas. -- Dave Page Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com Twitter: @pgsnake EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
-- On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>
>> There is more work to be done on the website to properly handle the
>> new version numbering scheme - for example, the versions app will
>> automatically add the .0, and the docs app includes it in the
>> generated URLs (not sure yet if that's a result of the version app
>> issue).
>
>
> Not particularly much more it seems. I'll commit a patch for this shortly.
Oh, sweet - that's one less thing on my todo :-)
Well, someone has to unbreak our website :P
> You never actually built any PDFs, right?
No, we don't normally for betas.
Ah, I can never remember that. I shall bug you again once we reach rc :)