Обсуждение: [pgsql-www] GSoC 2017 update

All,

Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for
2017.

Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done
anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording.

Barring objections, I plan to push this sometime soon as it'd be good to
have it updated before we formally submit our application to Google.

Apologies for not having it done sooner, I hadn't realized that we had
such a page (or, more likely, simply forgot from last year that it
existed).

Thanks!

Stephen

> On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for
> 2017.
>
> Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done
> anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording.

Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing.  The pushed patch leaves two blocks open
which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering.  Fixed in attached
patch.

cheers ./daniel


-- 
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www

Daniel,

* Daniel Gustafsson (daniel@yesql.se) wrote:
> > On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Please find attached an update which I'm preparing for our GSoC page for
> > 2017.
> >
> > Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done
> > anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording.
>
> Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing.  The pushed patch leaves two blocks open
> which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering.  Fixed in attached
> patch.

The rendering did look correct (actually, it looked better than it was
before because I had fixed another unclosed block that had intended
things incorrectly).

These changes look good on an initial look, I'll check it in more detail
and push it when I get to work.

Thanks Daniel!

Stephen

Daniel,

* Daniel Gustafsson (daniel@yesql.se) wrote:
> > On 08 Feb 2017, at 22:23, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> > Would be great if someone could take a look and make sure I've not done
> > anything horrible, it's mostly just updates and a bit of rewording.
>
> Sorry, I was too slow in reviewing.  The pushed patch leaves two blocks open
> which breaks validation but shouldn’t impact rendering.  Fixed in attached
> patch.

Pushed, thanks!

Stephen