Обсуждение: Fix for PG History web page
Our PG history web pages says talks about Postgres 8.0, which seems kind of old at this point: http://www.postgresql.org/about/history/ Today, PostgreSQL's user base is larger than ever and includes asizeable group of large corporations who use it in demandingenvironments.Some of these companies such as Afilias and Fujitsu havemade significant contributions to PostgreSQL'sdevelopment. And, true toits roots, it continues to improve in both sophistication andperformance, now more thanever. Version 8.0 is PostgreSQL's long ---awaited debut into the enterprise databasemarket, bringing featuressuch as tablespaces, Java stored procedures, point in time recovery, andnested transactions(savepoints). With it came a long awaited feature--- a native Windows port. Can someone update this? Can I submit a patch? -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Roman grave inscription +
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
Our PG history web pages says talks about Postgres 8.0, which seems kind
of old at this point:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/history/
Today, PostgreSQL's user base is larger than ever and includes a
sizeable group of large corporations who use it in demanding
environments. Some of these companies such as Afilias and Fujitsu have
made significant contributions to PostgreSQL's development. And, true to
its roots, it continues to improve in both sophistication and
performance, now more than ever. Version 8.0 is PostgreSQL's long
---
awaited debut into the enterprise database market, bringing features
such as tablespaces, Java stored procedures, point in time recovery, and
nested transactions (savepoints). With it came a long awaited feature
--- a native Windows port.
Can someone update this? Can I submit a patch?
I always think, that our history page is very outdated and requires more addition than you proposed. I have nothing against mentioning Afilias and Fujtsu, but then why we didn't acknowledged other companies ? Also, I think, better to discuss such things in -advocacy mailing list.
btw, I think we missed great Elein posts http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20041203184254.F6767@cookie.varlena.com
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Roman grave inscription +
--
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www