Обсуждение: "Subscribe" mails leaking through?
How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be moderated? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2010-08/msg00009.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-08/msg00682.php regards, tom lane
On 24 August 2010 19:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter > for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be > moderated? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-announce/2010-08/msg00009.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2010-08/msg00682.php I was beginning to wonder why I was starting to see those. -- Thom Brown Registered Linux user: #516935
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter > for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be > moderated? I was wondering about that myself re -announce, and I figured that the "subscribe" filter doesn't really matter anyway, as everything is moderated. So it's simply a matter of somebody approving something they should not have. For the record, it wasn't me this time. :) - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201008241538 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkx0H+sACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj6MACaAtP9QTIuOfIsph1sx6JSsd64 ph4AoOl3gjSBi5BwsRwGCNhmAB0hFfv2 =QxsT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: >> How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter >> for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be >> moderated? > > I was wondering about that myself re -announce, and I figured that > the "subscribe" filter doesn't really matter anyway, as everything is > moderated. So it's simply a matter of somebody approving something > they should not have. For the record, it wasn't me this time. :) Lucky for you. We're planning to tar-and-feather the guilty party when we find them. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > >> How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter > >> for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be > >> moderated? > > > > I was wondering about that myself re -announce, and I figured that > > the "subscribe" filter doesn't really matter anyway, as everything is > > moderated. So it's simply a matter of somebody approving something > > they should not have. For the record, it wasn't me this time. :) > > Lucky for you. We're planning to tar-and-feather the guilty party > when we find them. Sigh, you are knew here aren't you? tar-and-feather is reserved for a much different offense. This is more of a, "speakers dinner and being left with the check offense" JD > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:10 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> wrote: > >> How did either of these get through? Did somebody turn off the filter > >> for them? Even with that, surely *all* mail to -announce ought to be > >> moderated? > > > > I was wondering about that myself re -announce, and I figured that > > the "subscribe" filter doesn't really matter anyway, as everything is > > moderated. So it's simply a matter of somebody approving something > > they should not have. For the record, it wasn't me this time. :) > > Lucky for you. We're planning to tar-and-feather the guilty party > when we find them. Sigh, you are knew here aren't you? tar-and-feather is reserved for a much different offense. This is more of a, "speakers dinner and being left with the check offense" JD > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise Postgres Company > -- PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579 Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt