Обсуждение: PgFoundry update?
Hi all,<br /><br />Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same layout for 6 years and while it maybe a valuable resource, it really could do with a new lick of paint.<br /><br />What prompted me to mention this was visiting:<a href="http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/">http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/</a><br /><br />Thisis on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well documented, a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. Andthe main PostgreSQL site is very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate.<br /><br />I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version?<br /><br />Thanks<br /><br />Thom<br />
Thom Brown wrote: > Hi all, > > Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same layout > for 6 years and while it may be a valuable resource, it really could do with > a new lick of paint. > > What prompted me to mention this was visiting: > http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/ > > This is on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well documented, > a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. And the main PostgreSQL site is > very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate. > > I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version? We would love to update it but we haven't found anyone with enough time to do the job, and there are some customizations we did that we can't remember anymore. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
On 31 March 2010 23:37, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
There is a prototype update working. Guillaume Smet was working on it.
Ah, all is not lost then :)
Thom
On 31 March 2010 23:43, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
Well, except that Guillaume ran out of time :-(
Sounds sinister.
Well, except that Guillaume ran out of time :-( On 3/31/10, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote: > On 31 March 2010 23:37, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > >> There is a prototype update working. Guillaume Smet was working on it. >> >> > Ah, all is not lost then :) > > Thom > -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
There is a prototype update working. Guillaume Smet was working on it. On 3/31/10, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > Thom Brown wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same layout >> for 6 years and while it may be a valuable resource, it really could do >> with >> a new lick of paint. >> >> What prompted me to mention this was visiting: >> http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/ >> >> This is on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well >> documented, >> a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. And the main PostgreSQL site is >> very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate. >> >> I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version? > > We would love to update it but we haven't found anyone with enough time > to do the job, and there are some customizations we did that we can't > remember anymore. > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com > > -- > Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www > -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: >> Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same layout >> for 6 years and while it may be a valuable resource, it really could do with >> a new lick of paint. >> >> What prompted me to mention this was visiting: >> http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/ >> >> This is on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well documented, >> a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. And the main PostgreSQL site is >> very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate. >> >> I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version? > > We would love to update it but we haven't found anyone with enough time > to do the job, and there are some customizations we did that we can't > remember anymore. Knowing just some of the history of this issue on this list, I was a little afraid someone's head was going to explode when I saw Thom's email... ...Robert
On 1 April 2010 02:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:Knowing just some of the history of this issue on this list, I was a
>> Are there any plans for a redesign of PgFoundry? It's had the same layout
>> for 6 years and while it may be a valuable resource, it really could do with
>> a new lick of paint.
>>
>> What prompted me to mention this was visiting:
>> http://pgloader.projects.postgresql.org/
>>
>> This is on PgFoundry, but this "man page" was so clear and well documented,
>> a huge contrast to its PgFoundry entry. And the main PostgreSQL site is
>> very accessible, uncluttered, clear and easy to navigate.
>>
>> I see it's based on GForge. Time for an upgrade to the latest version?
>
> We would love to update it but we haven't found anyone with enough time
> to do the job, and there are some customizations we did that we can't
> remember anymore.
little afraid someone's head was going to explode when I saw Thom's
email...
...Robert
And I understand why as I've found the previous conversation.
Thom