Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additional options for performance
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php Ah, the joke's on you because that isn't the email. :-) I just tried looking up a sentence from the email in Google just now and it didn't find it either. The email is this one from March 24: http://momjian.us/mhonarc/patches_hold/msg00062.html The headers are: Message-ID: 1206356303.4285.804.camel@ebony.site [Thread Prev][Thread Next][Thread Index]Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump additionaloptions for performance * To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre ( at ) commandprompt ( dot ) com> * Subject: Re: [HACKERS]pg_dump additional options for performance * From: Simon Riggs <simon ( at ) 2ndquadrant ( dot ) com> * Date:Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:58:23 +0000 * cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce ( at ) momjian ( dot ) us>, pgsql-hackers ( at ) postgresql( dot ) org, psql-patches ( at ) postgresql ( dot ) org It is actually a pg_dump patch you made. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > > Ah, the joke's on you because that isn't the email. :-) Advantage Momjian, Riggs to serve. Or alternatively, how about I just post the patch again, so you can reference it? :) -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > Message-Id seemed to work fine for me: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1202310804.29242.54.camel@ebony.site Or perhaps you meant something different by a "message-id lookup"? Cheers, BJ
Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > > > > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > > > > Ah, the joke's on you because that isn't the email. :-) > > Advantage Momjian, Riggs to serve. LOL, excellent! > Or alternatively, how about I just post the patch again, so you can > reference it? :) Sure, but I think we need to find out what happened to it as well. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Brendan Jurd wrote: > On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > > > > Message-Id seemed to work fine for me: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1202310804.29242.54.camel@ebony.site > > Or perhaps you meant something different by a "message-id lookup"? That isn't the March 24 email I have --- it is an earlier email. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > That isn't the March 24 email I have --- it is an earlier email. > Curious. Looks like I for one never received the original March 24 email. Cheers, BJ
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:30 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 09:56 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > I cannot find this email in the email archives, even though it was sent > > > > > to both hackers and patches. A message-id lookup fails too. For that > > > > > reason, I have no URL to point to from the wiki. > > > > > > > > We should use Google then, 'cos it found it first time. > > > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00205.php > > > > > > Ah, the joke's on you because that isn't the email. :-) > > > > Advantage Momjian, Riggs to serve. > > LOL, excellent! > > > Or alternatively, how about I just post the patch again, so you can > > reference it? :) > > Sure, but I think we need to find out what happened to it as well. Well, I'll let you follow that up... BTW thanks for finding that. I made the mistake myself of checking patches to see if any of mine weren't on the Wiki. That meant I'd overlooked it also. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:31 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> That isn't the March 24 email I have --- it is an earlier email.
> Curious. Looks like I for one never received the original March 24 email.
I just studied my mail logs, and I can say definitively that it never
arrived here either. So whatever happened, this isn't the archives'
fault.
regards, tom lane