Обсуждение: PostgreSQL documentation search engine for Firefox
Hi guys, I thought it might be nice to share this with you. Given that I often search for information in PostgreSQL documentation, I have decided to add a search engine to my Firefox. I have used the old technology, when I have more time I will try the new standard (through XML), which should also work for IE7. Please give it a go: http://www.itpug.org/index.en.html under Mozilla Search Engine. One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message regarding the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this link came up as a recommendation, but it is broken: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html Ciao, Gabriele -- Gabriele Bartolini: Open source programmer and data architect Current Location: Prato, Tuscany, Italy gabriele.bartolini@gmail.com | www.gabrielebartolini.it "If I had been born ugly, you would never have heard of Pelé", George Best http://www.linkedin.com/in/gbartolini
Gabriele Bartolini escribió: > One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message regarding the > search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this link came up as a > recommendation, but it is broken: > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the 8.0 index? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Gabriele Bartolini escribió: > >> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message regarding the >> search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this link came up as a >> recommendation, but it is broken: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html > > Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so > it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the > 8.0 index? no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The websearch should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot database was last synced ... Stefan
Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Gabriele Bartolini escribió: >> >>> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message regarding >>> the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this link came up as a >>> recommendation, but it is broken: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html >> >> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so >> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the >> 8.0 index? > > no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from > the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The websearch > should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot database was last > synced ... Hmm, so somebody manually inserted items from the doc index into docbot's database? Hmm. I do note that items are added as the development version of the docs is updated, for example my recent addition of "protocol" is already in. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> Gabriele Bartolini escribió: >> >>> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message >>> regarding the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this >>> link came up as a recommendation, but it is broken: >>> >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html >> >> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so >> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the >> 8.0 index? > > no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from > the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The > websearch should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot > database was last synced ... Yup, that's correct. And the fulltext stuff certainly seems to be doing things right. Rob - whatever happened to setting up a scheduled job to sync the docbot stuff? //Magnus
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner escribió: >> Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Gabriele Bartolini escribió: >>> >>>> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message regarding >>>> the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this link came up as a >>>> recommendation, but it is broken: >>>> >>>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html >>> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so >>> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the >>> 8.0 index? >> no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from >> the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The websearch >> should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot database was last >> synced ... > > Hmm, so somebody manually inserted items from the doc index into > docbot's database? Hmm. I do note that items are added as the > development version of the docs is updated, for example my recent > addition of "protocol" is already in. not sure I understand - but the docbot database is totally seperated from the documentation search. The docbot database is basically the database the IRC bot uses and is maintained independently from the other search indexes. The live on is getting a lot of updates(though thois particular omission just got fixed) on a regular base but I'm not so sure how current the database the website uses is. Stefan
On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:54, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >> Gabriele Bartolini escribió: > >>> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message > >>> regarding the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this > >>> link came up as a recommendation, but it is broken: > >>> > >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html > >> > >> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so > >> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the > >> 8.0 index? > > Understand that the recommendations are keyword based... ie if you search on pg_shadow, it's quite likely you would want the above page. > > no I don't think so iirc the "recommended" stuff is actually coming from > > the docbot search database (ie the database of the irc bot). The > > websearch should be fully up2date but I'm not sure when the docbot > > database was last synced ... > not a question of sync issue... the bot on irc was still using that link as of this afternoon (when I saw the initial post in this thread on advocacy and then updated the irc bot) > Yup, that's correct. And the fulltext stuff certainly seems to be doing > things right. > > Rob - whatever happened to setting up a scheduled job to sync the docbot > stuff? > Let's pretend I was waiting for the move to the new server and the 8.3 updates to get done. Now that we have it, I'll see what I can do to push that forward. -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
Robert Treat escribió: > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 16:54, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > >> Gabriele Bartolini escribió: > > >>> One thing. My friend Marco Nenciarini sent me this message > > >>> regarding the search engine: he searched for 'pg_shadow' and this > > >>> link came up as a recommendation, but it is broken: > > >>> > > >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html > > >> > > >> Wow -- why is it recommended? pg_shadow stopped existing on 8.1, so > > >> it's almost three releases out of date. Is the search engine using the > > >> 8.0 index? > > Understand that the recommendations are keyword based... ie if you search on > pg_shadow, it's quite likely you would want the above page. Well, not in this case -- I would want this other page perhaps http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html or maybe http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html but in 8.1 and later releases, that page no longer exists. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/catalog-pg-shadow.html > Understand that the recommendations are keyword based... ie if you search on > pg_shadow, it's quite likely you would want the above page. No, these days you'd want http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/view-pg-shadow.html since the cited URL is 404. regards, tom lane
Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 schrieb Stefan Kaltenbrunner: > not sure I understand - but the docbot database is totally seperated > from the documentation search. Perhaps they shouldn't be? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008 schrieb Stefan Kaltenbrunner: >> not sure I understand - but the docbot database is totally seperated >> from the documentation search. > > Perhaps they shouldn't be? > You probably don't understand, docbot search is not something that is generated automagically, it's administered by IRC community for IRC community and because it proved to be useful thing, www team is using its database for keyword search. (btw somebody should commit my multiword fix already :) -- Regards Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)