Обсуждение: Beta4 patch for index.html and beta.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Attached.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


- -- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
            UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHVZchATb/zqfZUUQRAqv2AJ42mVlB8sm0l6Dr+6hTKT0LpQMw+wCgpFUF
Qnv1JSRLkaWZxWqWx+0bdeY=
=ME1L
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi,

On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:06 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Attached.

Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be at
least...")

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/

Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:06 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>> Attached.
> 
> Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be at
> least...")

is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?


Stefan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:03:15 +0100
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:

> Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 10:06 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > 
> >> Attached.
> > 
> > Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be
> > at least...")
> 
> is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?

No :) but then again, we didn't plan on a beta4 either. So I left the
window open.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> 
> Stefan
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the
> PostgreSQL project by donating at
> 
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> 


- -- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHVbMvATb/zqfZUUQRAgfGAKCgml+3BcI1tKn00QiEM1bGVviCuwCfWX80
FYvH+1j6O58abUOHARdIgC8=
=0cHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hi,

On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 21:03 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be
> at
> > least...")
>
> is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?

I don't know core's plan -- and what testing results will be. That's why
I changed the text from "will be" to "may be".

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ , RHCE
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
>> is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?

> No :) but then again, we didn't plan on a beta4 either. So I left the
> window open.

No, actually the text you submitted said that there *will be* a beta5.

That could happen, but I'd like to hope not...
        regards, tom lane

On Tuesday 04 December 2007 15:07, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 21:03 +0100, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > > Committed (changed "will be at least one more beta" part to "may be
> >
> > at
> >
> > > least...")
> >
> > is that actually the plan - ie having beta5 ?
>
> I don't know core's plan -- and what testing results will be. That's why
> I changed the text from "will be" to "may be".
>

Unfortunatly this mixes the very definitive "due to issues your testing
caught" with something completly speculative "there may be", which lends the
whole thing to being somewhat akwardly worded, especially when you consider
it phrased that way before any beta4 issues are caught.  If you really want
to leave a door open, rephrase it like "Depending on the level of bugs
reported, there may be an additional beta before RC1".  If you want it to be
a very narrow door, word it like "This will be the last beta before RC1
pending any critical bugs found in user testing". Personally I'd probably
just drop this sentence alltogether.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL