Обсуждение: Whatever happened about the paths?

The fact that we changed the naming standard for the source location at
least broke the docs building script.

Did we ever decide if we should rename it or symlink or what?

My vote is that we rename the directory to beta2, and then create a
symlink from "beta" pointing to the latest available version.

Unless there are any actual objections to this method, I'll make that
happen later today (when I've made sure the US folks have woken up and
had a chance to hav their say)

//Magnus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:53:51 +0100
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:

> The fact that we changed the naming standard for the source location
> at least broke the docs building script.
> 
> Did we ever decide if we should rename it or symlink or what?
> 
> My vote is that we rename the directory to beta2, and then create a
> symlink from "beta" pointing to the latest available version.
> 
> Unless there are any actual objections to this method, I'll make that
> happen later today (when I've made sure the US folks have woken up and
> had a chance to hav their say)

Seems reasonable to me.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> //Magnus
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the
> PostgreSQL project by donating at
> 
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
> 


- -- 
     === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/        UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHK0OUATb/zqfZUUQRAlB0AJsFV8RnWBxCwo1cpn8mwSKhVMzoFQCeOcHh
jRbs7Re2SlI/ZYS3gc+BH+M=
=Lyt0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> The fact that we changed the naming standard for the source location at
> least broke the docs building script.
> 
> Did we ever decide if we should rename it or symlink or what?
> 
> My vote is that we rename the directory to beta2, and then create a
> symlink from "beta" pointing to the latest available version.
> 
> Unless there are any actual objections to this method, I'll make that
> happen later today (when I've made sure the US folks have woken up and
> had a chance to hav their say)

I have now done this, will be up once the mirrors sync.

//Magnus