Обсуждение: Ancient Binary versions ...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there a reason why we are keeping them? Is it not sufficient to keep just the latest minor version along a branch? ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7 and earlier? - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGNNxr4QvfyHIvDvMRAn/5AJ4hlnoavQNimmjb5GuUZV1yv1nBmgCgl7WI IwLN41Ev6fXC+ckWMrnUjoA= =JsGm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Marc G. Fournier wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Is there a reason why we are keeping them? Is it not sufficient to keep just > the latest minor version along a branch? ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7 and > earlier? I think we should keep the source tarballs, but I see no reason to keep the binaries. Regards, Dave
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 - --On Sunday, April 29, 2007 20:08:15 +0100 Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Is there a reason why we are keeping them? Is it not sufficient to keep >> just the latest minor version along a branch? ie. keep 7.2.8, remove 7.2.7 >> and earlier? > > I think we should keep the source tarballs, but I see no reason to keep the > binaries. Oh ya, we have source that goes back to the v1.x days ... :) - ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGNPdZ4QvfyHIvDvMRAqCAAJ9yTgjXdv4vdXelR0nvAyKn2pU/nwCgqEli WqiiwXzB4fseSmBS+9se1Hw= =hgNj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----