Re: Group BY ...(cont.)
Re: Group BY ...(cont.)
От:
"tjk@tksoft.com" <tjk@tksoft.com>
Дата:
E.g. select workgroup from job group by workgroup; will that do? Troy > > Ok, if I want to use group by, then I have to put every select field > afterwards to group by. But I do want to group by one field. > Hence > select workgroup,id from job group by workgroup,id; > would create groups of 1? > But I want to group by workgroups. > Sorry if my explanation is fuzzy. > A. > > >
Group BY ...(cont.)
От:
Antti Linno <alligator@all.ee>
Дата:
Ok, if I want to use group by, then I have to put every select field afterwards to group by. But I do want to group by one field. Hence select workgroup,id from job group by workgroup,id; would create groups of 1? But I want to group by workgroups. Sorry if my explanation is fuzzy. A.
Re: Group BY ...(cont.)
От:
Jesus Aneiros <aneiros@jagua.cfg.sld.cu>
Дата:
No, you don't you could say: SELECT workgroup, id FROM job GROUP BY workgroups; On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Antti Linno wrote: > Ok, if I want to use group by, then I have to put every select field > afterwards to group by. But I do want to group by one field. > Hence > select workgroup,id from job group by workgroup,id; > would create groups of 1? > But I want to group by workgroups. > Sorry if my explanation is fuzzy. > A. > >