Обсуждение: Explain plan for 2 column index

I have 2 columns index.
The question is if optimizer can use both columns of an index or not,
i.e. the plan should read like this:

    Index Cond:
    ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
    AND ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone=
('now'::text)::timestamp(6) with time zone)

Whilst I am getting index scan on first column and filter on the other:

 Index Scan using testtab_name_date_from on testtab  (cost=0.00..2.01 rows=1
width=18)
   Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
   Filter: ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone =
('now'::text)::timestamp(6)with time zone)

Could the problem be timestamp column or timestamp with time zones?

Thank you,
Laimis
-------------------------------------------
Bellow are details of the test:


Create table testtab (name varchar(10), date_from timestamp);


create index testtab_name_date_from on testtab(name, date_from) ;


populated table with pseudo random data (10000), analyzed and tuned optimizer
to favour indexes instead of sequential scans.


Pg config:

random_page_cost = 0
cpu_index_tuple_cost = 0.0
enable_seqscan = false
cpu_tuple_cost = 1

On Thursday 29 January 2004 19:29, lnd@hnit.is wrote:
> I have 2 columns index.
> The question is if optimizer can use both columns of an index or not,

Should do.

> i.e. the plan should read like this:
>
>     Index Cond:
>     ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
>     AND ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone=
> ('now'::text)::timestamp(6) with time zone)
>
> Whilst I am getting index scan on first column and filter on the other:
>
>  Index Scan using testtab_name_date_from on testtab  (cost=0.00..2.01
> rows=1 width=18)
>    Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
>    Filter: ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone =
> ('now'::text)::timestamp(6)with time zone)
>
> Could the problem be timestamp column or timestamp with time zones?

What types are the columns here? If date_from isn't timestamp with time zone,
that might be the issue. Also, I'm not convinced timestamp is the same thing
as timestamp(6) - why the different accuracies.

Also, note that 'now' is deprecated - now() or CURRENT_TIMESTAMP/DATE/etc are
preferred.
--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com> writes:
>> Index Scan using testtab_name_date_from on testtab  (cost=0.00..2.01
>> rows=1 width=18)
>> Index Cond: ((name)::text = 'name1'::text)
>> Filter: ((date_from)::timestamp with time zone =
>> ('now'::text)::timestamp(6)with time zone)

> What types are the columns here? If date_from isn't timestamp with time zone,
> that might be the issue.

It clearly isn't, since we can see a coercion to timestamp with time
zone in the query.  My guess is that the original SQL was
    WHERE ... date_from = current_timestamp
This should be
    WHERE ... date_from = localtimestamp
if timestamp without tz is the intended column datatype.  Of course,
it might just be that date_from was declared as the wrong type (it
really sucks that SQL specifies "timestamp" to default to "without
time zone" ...)

            regards, tom lane