Обсуждение: Re: [HACKERS] CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Is there anything to do for 8.2 here?

I'm working on Tom's idea. It is not a feature and does not change
the on-disk-structures, so I hope it meet the 8.2 deadline...

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I'm wondering about doing something similar to what
> TransactionIdIsInProgress does, ie, make use of the PGPROC lists
> of live subtransactions.  Suppose that GetSnapshotData copies not
> only top xids but live subxids into the snapshot, and adds a flag
> indicating whether the subxids are complete (ie, none of the subxid
> lists have overflowed).  Then if the flag is set, tqual.c doesn't
> need to do SubTransGetTopmostTransaction() before searching the
> list.

I added a subxid array to Snapshot and running subxids are gathered from
PGPROC->subxids cache. There are two overflowed case; any of PGPROC->subxids
are overflowed or the number of total subxids exceeds pre-allocated buffers.
If overflowed, we cannot avoid to call SubTransGetTopmostTransaction.

I tested the patch and did not see any context switch storm which comes
from pg_subtrans, but there may be some bugs in the visibility checking.
It would be very nice if you could review or test the patch.

Regards,
---
ITAGAKI Takahiro
NTT Open Source Software Center