Обсуждение: Re: Can't get more than 255 chars out of memo field in Acc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeff Eckermann [mailto:jeff_eckermann@yahoo.com]
> Sent: 27 November 2002 20:16
> To: Bruce Momjian; justin@postgresql.org
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; Jeff Eckermann
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Can't get more than 255 chars out of memo
> field in Acc
>
> --- Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote:
> >
> > Where can we document this information?  I don't see
> > it on the techdocs
> > site.
> >
>
> Good question.  The available stuff is piecemeal, and
> split between techdocs and the odbc site.  Joel
> Burton's FAQ is the largest, but is incomplete and
> appears not to have been worked on much for the last
> couple of years.  There is the makings of a good FAQ
> on the odbc site: perhaps that could be moved to
> techdocs, and expanded using reader contributions?  I
> would be happy to put in some pieces, although I am
> sure that there are plenty whose knowledge is much
> greater than mine.
>
> Justin?

Or Dave...

The FAQ has been part of the ODBC stuff since at least 1996 iirc. It has
recently moved from the ODBC site to the psqlODBC project site on Gborg
as part of our shakeup of the interfaces etc.

It is worth remembering that techdocs is (at present) meant for
unofficial, yet useful docs. 'Official' docs are not currently stored
there.

I have updated the FAQ with new items as required (and submitted), but
as was recently said in another thread, FAQ implies 'frequent' which
this problem is not (it's the first time I've heard of it in many
years).

Regards, Dave.

--- Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The FAQ has been part of the ODBC stuff since at
> least 1996 iirc. It has
> recently moved from the ODBC site to the psqlODBC
> project site on Gborg
> as part of our shakeup of the interfaces etc.
>
> It is worth remembering that techdocs is (at
> present) meant for
> unofficial, yet useful docs. 'Official' docs are not
> currently stored
> there.
>
> I have updated the FAQ with new items as required
> (and submitted), but
> as was recently said in another thread, FAQ implies
> 'frequent' which
> this problem is not (it's the first time I've heard
> of it in many
> years).
>
> Regards, Dave.
>
Sorry for the trespass ;-)
Looks like what we really want is a "Guide", as Justin
suggested (of course, a link from the Techdocs page to
the FAQ would be good).
I do not feel sufficiently qualified to write a "Using
MS Access with PostgreSQL" guide, but I would be happy
to collaborate with any others who would be willing to
put time into it.
Any volunteers?

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com