Обсуждение: libxml2 2.9.3 breaks xml test output
Hello,
I just noticed that last night all built branches failed on my buildfarm
animal, jaguarundi. They all failed on the "xml" test, and the output is
essentially the same everywhere:
***************
*** 9,16 **** LINE 1: INSERT INTO xmltest VALUES (3, '<wrong'); ^ DETAIL:
line1: Couldn't find end of Start Tag wrong line 1
- <wrong
- ^ SELECT * FROM xmltest; id | data ----+--------------------
--- 9,14 ----
***************
*** 63,70 **** LINE 1: SELECT xmlconcat('bad', '<syntax'); ^ DETAIL: line 1:
Couldn'tfind end of Start Tag syntax line 1
- <syntax
- ^ SELECT xmlconcat('<foo/>', NULL, '<?xml version="1.1"
standalone="no"?><bar/>'); xmlconcat --------------
The last thing I did in regard to XML on this system was upgrade libxml2
from 2.9.2 to 2.9.3. I bisected it a a bit and the guilty commit to
libxml2 is ce0b0d0d8 "Do not print error context when there is none"
from about two weeks ago.
I have zero experience with libxml2, so no idea if the previous context
level can be turned on again. IMHO, the libxml2 change is a bug in
itself; PostgreSQL's error messages are more readable with the XML text
in them.
--
Christian
On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net> wrote: > I have zero experience with libxml2, so no idea if the previous context > level can be turned on again. IMHO, the libxml2 change is a bug in itself; > PostgreSQL's error messages are more readable with the XML text in them. See here for example you are not the only one to see this problem: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRA4xJQFGNQCqMCYGx-umgMr3Stt3xFEUw7kBsOiOvGhkA@mail.gmail.com https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286692 -- Michael
* Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net> wrote: >> I have zero experience with libxml2, so no idea if the previous context >> level can be turned on again. IMHO, the libxml2 change is a bug in itself; >> PostgreSQL's error messages are more readable with the XML text in them. > > See here for example you are not the only one to see this problem: > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAFj8pRA4xJQFGNQCqMCYGx-umgMr3Stt3xFEUw7kBsOiOvGhkA@mail.gmail.com > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286692 Right. Sorry, I had checked the archives for earlier mentions of the issue, but had not found Pavel's post. -- Christian