RLS restrictive hook policies

RLS restrictive hook policies

Re: RLS restrictive hook policies

Re: RLS restrictive hook policies

Dean, all,

* Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote:
> Agreed.  I'm happy to commit that change and back-patch it to 9.5,
> barring objections.  Given that the only way to have restrictive
> policies currently is using hooks, I don't believe there's any
> documentation update required either; of course, I'll update the comment
> to reflect this discussion/decision and make any necessary changes to
> test_rls_hooks.

Patch attached to make this change, with appropriate comment updates and
fixes to the test_rls_hooks modules.

Comments?

	Thanks!

		Stephen

Re: RLS restrictive hook policies

Re: RLS restrictive hook policies