Обсуждение: CREATE FUNCTION .. LEAKPROOF docs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

CREATE FUNCTION .. LEAKPROOF docs

От
Dean Rasheed
Дата:
I think the docs for the LEAKPROOF option in create_function.sgml
ought to mention RLS as well as security barrier views. Also the
current text is no longer strictly correct in light of commit
dcbf5948e12aa60b4d6ab65b6445897dfc971e01. Suggested rewording
attached.

Regards,
Dean
Вложения

Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. LEAKPROOF docs

От
Joe Conway
Дата:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 06/14/2015 03:46 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> I think the docs for the LEAKPROOF option in create_function.sgml
> ought to mention RLS as well as security barrier views. Also the
> current text is no longer strictly correct in light of commit
> dcbf5948e12aa60b4d6ab65b6445897dfc971e01. Suggested rewording
> attached.

Any objections out there to this doc patch? It rings true and reads
well to me. I'd like to check another item off the 9.5 Open Items list..
.

- --
Joe Conway
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=9wOA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Вложения

Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. LEAKPROOF docs

От
Joe Conway
Дата:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 07/29/2015 04:46 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 03:46 AM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> I think the docs for the LEAKPROOF option in
>> create_function.sgml ought to mention RLS as well as security
>> barrier views. Also the current text is no longer strictly
>> correct in light of commit 
>> dcbf5948e12aa60b4d6ab65b6445897dfc971e01. Suggested rewording 
>> attached.
> 
> Any objections out there to this doc patch? It rings true and
> reads well to me. I'd like to check another item off the 9.5 Open
> Items list..

Pushed to HEAD and 9.5

Joe


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
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=LzHH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----