Обсуждение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead ports

On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Remove dead ports
> 
> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor
> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me:
> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta?

Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-)

Btw., I had intentionally kept the uses in ps_status.c and getrusage.c,
because they remain useful in case someone wants to use these files for
reference.  But I guess that's debatable, because we no longer have a
way to prove that those uses actually continue to work.

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor
>> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me:
>> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta?

> Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-)

Next week, I thought.
        regards, tom lane

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 01:15:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On ons, 2012-05-02 at 00:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Checking this patch, I noticed that config.guess and config.sub harbor
> >> most of the remaining references to those platforms, which reminded me:
> >> don't we usually update those files from autoconf upstream before beta?
> 
> > Yes, once we know when beta is, we can move on that. ;-)
> 
> Next week, I thought.

How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon?  Was that
resolved?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

>> Next week, I thought.
> 
> How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon?  Was that
> resolved?

I have yet to see a confirmed date, guys.  If we expect any support from
the packagers and/or the advocacy volunteers, then people need at least
a week's notice, probably more.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>> How are we handling the Monday release with everyone at PGCon?  Was that
>> resolved?

> I have yet to see a confirmed date, guys.  If we expect any support from
> the packagers and/or the advocacy volunteers, then people need at least
> a week's notice, probably more.

I haven't seen anybody positively say we can't do a wrap next Thursday
and release Monday, so I've been assuming that's what will happen.
If there are reasons to think it won't work, let's hear 'em now.
        regards, tom lane