Обсуждение: CommitFest 2009-09 Plans and Call for Reviewers
Folks, CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having discussions with a number of people, and the result of those discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann, Stephen Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what we're calling patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions around a patch don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited, Returned with Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the CommitFest overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're tentatively looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing by topic, as follows: Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages Stephen Frost: Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous Selena Deckelmann: Performance, Clients Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel free to reply here. And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for which I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest is to have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers! http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/RRReviewers And of course my personal favorite: http://wiki.postgresql.org/images/5/58/11_eggyknap-patch-review.pdf Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are available to review; feel free to include any information that might be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch. ...Robert
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:13:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > Folks, > > CommitFest 2009-09 is now only days away! I have been having > discussions with a number of people, and the result of those > discussions is that I have agreed to manage the next CommitFest > insofar as patch assignment is concerned. Selena Deckelmann, > Stephen Frost, and Brendan Jurd have agreed to assist with what > we're calling patch-chasing: that is, making sure that discussions > around a patch don't die, and that it gets marked as Commited, > Returned with Feedback, or Rejected in a timely fashion, so that the > CommitFest overall gets closed out in a timely fashion. We're > tentatively looking at dividing up responsibility for patch-chasing > by topic, as follows: > > Brendan Jurd: SQL Features, Procedural Languages Stephen Frost: > Security, Contrib, Miscellaneous Selena Deckelmann: Performance, > Clients > > Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel > free to reply here. > > And that brings me to the next topic. Although I have received many > endorsements of the way that I managed the last CommitFest, for > which I am grateful, I think that the real key to a good CommitFest > is to have a good group of reviewers. We had an excellent group of > reviewers for the last CommitFest and I am hoping that all of those > people will volunteer again. Of course, we also need new reviewers! > > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch I'm in :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel > free to reply here. +1 And I'm available to review again, of course. Best, David
Hi, On Thursday 10 September 2009 03:13:40 Robert Haas wrote: > Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are > available to review; feel free to include any information that might > be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch. I am in. I dont know yet how much time I will have, but we will see. Andres
On Thursday 10 September 2009 18:23:13 Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > On Thursday 10 September 2009 03:13:40 Robert Haas wrote: > > Please send me an email (without copying the list) if you are > > available to review; feel free to include any information that might > > be helpful in assigning you an appropriate patch. > > I am in. > > I dont know yet how much time I will have, but we will see. I am officially to stupid to correctly use the "Reply" Button (i.e. select the correct address to reply to). Andres
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:23:00AM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Sep 9, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > >> Hopefully this plan is acceptable to everyone. If not, please feel >> free to reply here. > > +1 > > And I'm available to review again, of course. > > Best, > > David > > -- > Sent via pgsql-rrreviewers mailing list (pgsql-rrreviewers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-rrreviewers Please count me in. -- --Dan