Обсуждение: Fate of pgsnmpd
Hi Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. greetings, Florian Pflug
Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? > The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. there seems to be quite a lot of work going on in the cvs tree: http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pgsnmpd/pgsnmpd/ so i would guess it is still active though without an release for a while. Stefan
Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? > The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. It is. There is a team (Josh Tolley, me and Hiroshi Saito) working for RFC 1697 compliance. When that's done, there are some other additions in the pipeline. There's been a rewrite of several things since 0.1b1, and what we have now is not ready for production use. But it will be :-) //Magnus
> ------- Original Message ------- > From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org> > To: "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org> > Sent: 06/04/07, 20:12:39 > Subject: [HACKERS] Fate of pgsnmpd > > Hi > > Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? > The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. Yes, it is. There have been a number of commits recently and I believe Josh(?) is giving a talk about it at pgCon. Regards, Dave
On 4/6/07, Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> wrote: > Yes, it is. There have been a number of commits recently and I believe Josh(?) is giving a talk about it at pgCon. > > Regards, Dave Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first. Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific MIB.. - Josh Tolley
On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 06:01:10AM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote: > Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot > easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first. > Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't > cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want > to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific > MIB.. I might be interested in contributing to this effort, if not with code then at least with discussion and testing. I'm currently using MRTG to execute Perl scripts that query the statistics views and I've been thinking about rewriting those scripts to be AgentX subagents so they'd be queryable via SNMP. -- Michael Fuhr
Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2007 at 06:01:10AM -0600, Josh Tolley wrote: >> Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot >> easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first. >> Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't >> cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want >> to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific >> MIB.. > > I might be interested in contributing to this effort, if not with > code then at least with discussion and testing. I'm currently using > MRTG to execute Perl scripts that query the statistics views and > I've been thinking about rewriting those scripts to be AgentX > subagents so they'd be queryable via SNMP. > We're definitely interested in listening :-) Please join us over at the pgsnmpd list. //Magnus
Josh, > Josh just found his passport, which will make giving that talk a lot > easier ;) As Magnus said, we're aiming at RFC 1697 compliance first. > Since the RFC's MIB is designed to apply to *any* database, it doesn't > cover lots of the specific statistics a pgsql person would likely want > to see, so after the RFC work is done we'll be adding a pgsql-specific > MIB.. FYI, the MySQL folks want to talk to you about maybe lobbying to change the RFC. They feel that an awful lot of RFC1697 is Oracle-specific, and are wondering if we can do anything about it. Anyway, if you want to ping them, Brian Aker <brian@mysql.com>. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
On 4/7/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > FYI, the MySQL folks want to talk to you about maybe lobbying to change the > RFC. They feel that an awful lot of RFC1697 is Oracle-specific, and are > wondering if we can do anything about it. Indeed... I've had brief discussions with a Mark Atwood, IIRC, who's working on the MySQL implementation. I'll drop them a line, and cc pgsnmpd-devel. Thanks. - Josh Tolley