Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2. Thanks.
... which means test_fsync is now broken. Why did you apply a patch
when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I have applied your test_fsync patch for 8.2. Thanks.
>
> ... which means test_fsync is now broken. Why did you apply a patch
> when the author pointed out that the program isn't working?
I thought his code was OK, but the OS had issues. Clearly we need to
update test_fsync.c because it doesn't match the code. I have reverted
the patch but some day we need a fixed version.
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +