Обсуждение: Re: [GENERAL] different sort order in windows and linux version
Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 12:55:18AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Fine for you, not so fine for other people with different concerns. > > > > I'm not unsympathetic to your general point, but black-and-white > > arguments won't get far in this discussion. It's all about tradeoffs > > ... it's most definitely not about one-size-fits-all. > > What I find most confusing is that the patch for adding ICU to postgres > (using a configure switch) has been around for a while, at one point it > was even in the queue for 8.2: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-08/msg00309.php > > It's vanished from there, not sure why. Even so, we still get regular > requests for it. Presumably it was removed here: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-03/msg00233.php > > Given the patch does nothing if you don't enable it, I'm not quite sure > what the downsides would be... > > Have a nice day, > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate. -- End of PGP section, PGP failed! -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Aug 11, 2006, at 13:31 , Bruce Momjian wrote: > Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2? I'd like to see it as an option. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2?
Uh, that wasn't seriously on the table was it? AFAIR we don't have a
current patch (ie something that applies cleanly to HEAD or near HEAD)
and I have not seen any discussion about it since March or so.
I don't wish to be overly negative, but we have a very long list of
patches that *are* on the table for 8.2, and this suggestion strikes me
as randomly adding a proposed feature ten days after feature freeze.
You should have said the above several weeks ago if you wanted to be
taken seriously.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:48:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2? > > Uh, that wasn't seriously on the table was it? AFAIR we don't have a > current patch (ie something that applies cleanly to HEAD or near HEAD) > and I have not seen any discussion about it since March or so. Unfortunatly I agree. I was kinda prepared to have a shot at resurrecting the patch if there was some serious interest but nothing happened. It's way too late in the freeze now. There's still 8.3... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:48:27AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > > Do we want to enable a ICU build option in 8.2? > > > > Uh, that wasn't seriously on the table was it? AFAIR we don't have a > > current patch (ie something that applies cleanly to HEAD or near HEAD) > > and I have not seen any discussion about it since March or so. > > Unfortunatly I agree. I was kinda prepared to have a shot at > resurrecting the patch if there was some serious interest but nothing > happened. > > It's way too late in the freeze now. There's still 8.3... OK. The email was in my mailbox and it never got addressed before feature freeze. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +