Обсуждение: Timeline for 7.4.3?
Hey, We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was? Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting. +1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
Вложения
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches
> out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering
> what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was?
Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there
are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > > We have many machines that run Solaris. I know that there are patches > > out there for some of the bugs in 7.4.2 for Solaris but I was wondering > > what the timeline for an official 7.4.3 was? > > Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there > are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point. The only post-7.4.2 Solaris fixes I can think of are for threaded builds. Do you use those? If so, you can grab CVS REL7_4_STABLE and see how that works for you. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
Bruce Momjian wrote: >Tom Lane wrote: > > >>Don't hold your breath ... 7.4.2 was only a couple weeks ago, and there >>are no critical bugs in the CVS logs at this point. >> >> > >The only post-7.4.2 Solaris fixes I can think of are for threaded >builds. Do you use those? If so, you can grab CVS REL7_4_STABLE and >see how that works for you. > > There are some pg_autovacum fixes, most serious being the one that causes it to vacuum large tables far too often. I know it's a contrib module, but does seem to be getting used a lot.
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote: > There are some pg_autovacum fixes, most serious being the one that > causes it to vacuum large tables far too often. I know it's a contrib > module, but does seem to be getting used a lot. Good reason why it *should* be in GForge/GBorg ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664